Journal: Cancer Medicine
Article Title: Molecular Characterization and Clinical Relevance of MGMT ‐Silenced Pancreatic Cancer
doi: 10.1002/cam4.70393
Figure Lengend Snippet: Genomic features of PAC cases according to MGMT methylation status. (a) Oncoprint summarizing somatic SNVs/indels according to MGMT methylation status. The top 20 most frequently mutated genes are presented. Upper bars represent TMB levels. MGMT ‐methylated tumors are shown on the far right. (b) Bar plot reporting results of enrichment analysis of SNVs/indels according to MGMT methylation status. On the x axis, enrichment score is reported as the z‐score scaled‐, natural logarithm‐transformed odds ratio of the comparison between MGMT ‐methylated versus not‐methylated cases. Bars are colored according to the enrichment score and adjusted (after Benjamini–Hochberg multiple test correction) p value as orange (significantly enriched in not‐methylated, enrichment score ≤ 0 and adjusted p ≤ 0.05), yellow (enriched in not‐methylated, enrichment score < 0 and adjusted p value > 0.05), light red (enriched in methylated, enrichment score > 0 and adjusted p > 0.05), and dark red (significantly enriched in methylated, enrichment score > 0 and adjusted p ≤ 0.05). (c, d) Barplots reporting results of oncogenic signaling pathways analysis according to MGMT methylation status. Fraction of each affected pathway (c) and fraction of samples affected (d). The NRF2 pathway is not plotted as it was not affected in any cases. The * identifies the only significant different, as evaluated by Fisher's exact test. Del, Deletion—Ins, Insertion; MGMT , O 6 ‐methylguanine‐ DNA methyltransferase; NRF2 , Nuclear Respiratory Factor 2; TMB , tumor mutational burden.
Article Snippet: MGMT promoter methylation status was assessed by pyrosequencing (via the MGMT plus Diatech Pharmacogenetics [Jesi, Italy] kit), as previously described [ ].
Techniques: Methylation, Transformation Assay, Comparison, Protein-Protein interactions